Evaluating 10 Commercially Available SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Serological Tests by Use of the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) Method.

Numerous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rapid serological tests have been developed, but their accuracy has usually been assessed using very few samples, and rigorous comparisons between these tests are scarce. In this study, we evaluated and compared 10 commercially available SARS-CoV-2 rapid serological tests using the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) methodology. Two hundred fifty serum samples from 159 PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients (collected 0 to 32 days after the onset of symptoms) were tested with rapid serological tests. Control serum samples (n = 254) were retrieved from pre-coronavirus disease (COVID) periods from patients with other coronavirus infections (n = 11), positivity for rheumatoid factors (n = 3), IgG/IgM hyperglobulinemia (n = 9), malaria (n = 5), or no documented viral infection (n = 226). All samples were tested using rapid lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) from 10 manufacturers. Only four tests achieved ≥98% specificity, with the specificities ranging from 75.7% to 99.2%. The sensitivities varied by the day of sample collection after the onset of symptoms, from 31.7% to 55.4% (days 0 to 9), 65.9% to 92.9% (days 10 to 14), and 81.0% to 95.2% (>14 days). Only three of the tests evaluated met French health authorities' thresholds for SARS-CoV-2 serological tests (≥90% sensitivity and ≥98% specificity). Overall, the performances varied greatly between tests, with only one-third meeting acceptable specificity and sensitivity thresholds. Knowledge of the analytical performances of these tests will allow clinicians and, most importantly, laboratorians to use them with more confidence; could help determine the general population's immunological status; and may help diagnose some patients with false-negative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) results.

Pharmacokinetic properties and metabolism of a new potent antimalarial N-alkylamidine compound, M64, and its corresponding bioprecursors.

Antimalarial activities and pharmacokinetics of the bis-alkylamidine, M64, and its amidoxime, M64-AH, and O-methylsulfonate, M64-S-Me, derivatives were investigated. M64 and M64-S-Me had the most potent activity against the Plasmodium falciparum growth (IC(50)<12nM). The three compounds can clear the Plasmodium vinckei infection in mice (ED(50)<10mg/kg). A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was validated to simultaneously quantify M64 and M64-AH in human and rat plasma. M64 is partially metabolized to M64-monoamidoxime and M64-monoacetamide by rat and mouse liver microsomes. The amidoxime M64-AH undergoes extensive metabolism forming M64, M64-monoacetamide, M64-diacetamide and M64-monoamidoxime. Strong interspecies differences were observed. The pharmacokinetic profiles of M64, M64-AH and M64-S-Me were studied in rat after intravenous and oral administrations. M64 is partially metabolized to M64-AH; while M64-S-Me is rapidly and totally converted to M64 and M64-AH. M64-AH is mostly oxidized to the inactive M64-diacetamine while its N-reduction to the efficient M64 is a minor metabolic pathway. Oral dose of M64-AH was well absorbed (38%) and converted to M64 and M64-diacetamide. This study generated substantial information about the properties of this class of antimalarial drugs. Other routes of synthesis will be explored to prevent oxidative transformation of the amidoxime and to favour the N-reduction.